Filed: Aug. 28, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 28, 2018
Summary: ORDER (1) ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING THE REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE DATED AUGUST 3, 2018 (DKT. 59 AND 60), (2) DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO ENFORCE INJUNCTIONS (DKT. 39), (3) DENYING PLAINTIFF'S SECOND MOTION TO ENFORCE INJUNCTIONS (DKT. 48), (4) GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DKT. 42), AND (5) DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DISCOVERY (DKT. 54) AND MOTION FOR EVIDENTIARY HEARING (DKT. 58) AS MOOT MARK A. GOLDSMITH , District Judge . This matter is p
Summary: ORDER (1) ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING THE REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE DATED AUGUST 3, 2018 (DKT. 59 AND 60), (2) DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO ENFORCE INJUNCTIONS (DKT. 39), (3) DENYING PLAINTIFF'S SECOND MOTION TO ENFORCE INJUNCTIONS (DKT. 48), (4) GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DKT. 42), AND (5) DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DISCOVERY (DKT. 54) AND MOTION FOR EVIDENTIARY HEARING (DKT. 58) AS MOOT MARK A. GOLDSMITH , District Judge . This matter is pr..
More
ORDER (1) ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING THE REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE DATED AUGUST 3, 2018 (DKT. 59 AND 60), (2) DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO ENFORCE INJUNCTIONS (DKT. 39), (3) DENYING PLAINTIFF'S SECOND MOTION TO ENFORCE INJUNCTIONS (DKT. 48), (4) GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DKT. 42), AND (5) DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DISCOVERY (DKT. 54) AND MOTION FOR EVIDENTIARY HEARING (DKT. 58) AS MOOT
MARK A. GOLDSMITH, District Judge.
This matter is presently before the Court on the Reports and Recommendations (R&R) of Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen, issued on August 3, 2018. In the first R&R, the Magistrate Judge recommends granting the motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 42) by Defendants Potts, Horgan (a/k/a Lilley Conrad), Collier, Stanifer, Holman, Spirko, Deland, Kline, Stamman, Chamberlain, Brown, Wallerstein, Okete, and Klee, and recommends that the Court sua sponte dismiss Defendants Dinsa, Kornowski, McGuire, King, Pomery, and Parke with prejudice. In the second R&R, the Magistrate Judge recommends denying Plaintiff's motions seeking injunctive relief (Dkts. 39 and 48). The parties have not filed objections to the R&Rs, and the time to do so has expired. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). The Court has reviewed the R&R and concludes that the Magistrate Judge has reached the proper conclusion for the proper reasons. Therefore, the R&Rs are accepted and adopted as the findings and conclusions of the Court.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 42) by Defendants Potts, Horgan (a/k/a Lilley Conrad), Collier, Stanifer, Holman, Spirko, Deland, Kline, Stamman, Chamberlain, Brown, Wallerstein, Okete, and Klee is GRANTED and they are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
It is further ORDERED sua sponte Defendants Dinsa, Kornowski, McGuire, King, Pomery, and Parke are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff's motions to enforce injunctions (Dkts. 39 and 48) are DENIED.
It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for discovery (dkt. 54) and motion for an evidentiary hearing (dkt. 58) are DENIED as moot
SO ORDERED.
