Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Pouncy v. Palmer, 13-cv-14695. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan Number: infdco20180910887 Visitors: 14
Filed: Sep. 07, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 07, 2018
Summary: ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PETITIONER'S EMERGENCY MOTION FOR BOND PENDING RESOLUTION OF HABEAS CLAIMS AND BASED ON ACTUAL INNOCENCE (ECF #158) MATTHEW F. LEITMAN , District Judge . Currently before the Court is Petitioner Omar Rashad Pouncy's Emergency Motion for Bond Pending Resolution of Habeas Claims and Based on Actual Innocence. ( See ECF #158). The motion is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Court is unwilling to grant Pouncy bond at this time and in the current procedural postur
More

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PETITIONER'S EMERGENCY MOTION FOR BOND PENDING RESOLUTION OF HABEAS CLAIMS AND BASED ON ACTUAL INNOCENCE (ECF #158)

Currently before the Court is Petitioner Omar Rashad Pouncy's Emergency Motion for Bond Pending Resolution of Habeas Claims and Based on Actual Innocence. (See ECF #158). The motion is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Court is unwilling to grant Pouncy bond at this time and in the current procedural posture of the case. The Court is in the process of reviewing Pouncy's claim of actual innocence — post-hearing briefing on that issue is in process — and the Court will not release Pouncy on bond during that review. If the Court resolves Pouncy's actual innocence claim in his favor or otherwise rules in his favor of the merits of any claim in his habeas petition, Pouncy may renew his motion for bond at that time.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer