Derocher v. Commissioner of Social Security, 17-11858. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20180920c20
Visitors: 9
Filed: Sep. 19, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 19, 2018
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [17]; DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [15]; AND GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [16] ARTHUR J. TARNOW , District Judge . Plaintiff Melissa Derocher seeks judicial review of an Administrative Law Judge's decision denying her claim for Disability Insurance Benefits and Supplemental Security Income Benefits. Plaintiff filed a Motion for Summary Judgment [15] on November 20, 2017. Defendant filed a Motion for Summary Judg
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [17]; DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [15]; AND GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [16] ARTHUR J. TARNOW , District Judge . Plaintiff Melissa Derocher seeks judicial review of an Administrative Law Judge's decision denying her claim for Disability Insurance Benefits and Supplemental Security Income Benefits. Plaintiff filed a Motion for Summary Judgment [15] on November 20, 2017. Defendant filed a Motion for Summary Judgm..
More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [17]; DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [15]; AND GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [16]
ARTHUR J. TARNOW, District Judge.
Plaintiff Melissa Derocher seeks judicial review of an Administrative Law Judge's decision denying her claim for Disability Insurance Benefits and Supplemental Security Income Benefits. Plaintiff filed a Motion for Summary Judgment [15] on November 20, 2017. Defendant filed a Motion for Summary Judgment [16] on December 15, 2017.
On August 31, 2018, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report & Recommendation [17] ("R&R") recommending that the Court deny Plaintiff's Motion [15] and grant Defendant's Motion [16]. Neither party has filed any objection to the R&R.
The Court having reviewed the record, the R&R [17] is hereby ADOPTED and entered as the findings and conclusions of the Court.
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment [15] is DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [16] is GRANTED.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle