U.S. v. MacLloyd, 08-CR-20289. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20181029840
Visitors: 7
Filed: Oct. 26, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 26, 2018
Summary: ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY GEORGE CARAM STEEH , District Judge . This matter comes before the court on remand from the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals for determination of whether to grant or deny a certificate of appealability to defendant David MacLloyd. On May 24, 2018, this court entered its Order Denying Defendant's 28 U.S.C. 2255 Motion but did not issue or deny a certificate of appealability as it is required to do pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Sectio
Summary: ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY GEORGE CARAM STEEH , District Judge . This matter comes before the court on remand from the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals for determination of whether to grant or deny a certificate of appealability to defendant David MacLloyd. On May 24, 2018, this court entered its Order Denying Defendant's 28 U.S.C. 2255 Motion but did not issue or deny a certificate of appealability as it is required to do pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section..
More
ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY
GEORGE CARAM STEEH, District Judge.
This matter comes before the court on remand from the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals for determination of whether to grant or deny a certificate of appealability to defendant David MacLloyd. On May 24, 2018, this court entered its Order Denying Defendant's 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion but did not issue or deny a certificate of appealability as it is required to do pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Proceedings for the United States District Courts. A certificate of appealability may issue "only if the applicant has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). Defendant in this case has made no such showing. For this reason, a certificate of appealability is DENIED.
Source: Leagle
