Pouncy v. Palmer, 13-cv-14695. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20190104a12
Visitors: 15
Filed: Jan. 03, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 03, 2019
Summary: ORDER DENYING AS MOOT (1) PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR ACCESS TO COUNSEL BY TELEPHONE (ECF #205) AND (2) PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR IMMEDIATE CONSIDERATION (ECF #204) MATTHEW F. LEITMAN , District Judge . On November 29, 2015, Petitioner Omar Rashad Pouncy filed two motions: (1) a motion for access to his counsel by telephone and permission to conduct attorney-client conference calls and (2) a request for immediate consideration of his access motion. ( See ECF ## 204, 205.) The Court held an on-t
Summary: ORDER DENYING AS MOOT (1) PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR ACCESS TO COUNSEL BY TELEPHONE (ECF #205) AND (2) PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR IMMEDIATE CONSIDERATION (ECF #204) MATTHEW F. LEITMAN , District Judge . On November 29, 2015, Petitioner Omar Rashad Pouncy filed two motions: (1) a motion for access to his counsel by telephone and permission to conduct attorney-client conference calls and (2) a request for immediate consideration of his access motion. ( See ECF ## 204, 205.) The Court held an on-th..
More
ORDER DENYING AS MOOT (1) PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR ACCESS TO COUNSEL BY TELEPHONE (ECF #205) AND (2) PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR IMMEDIATE CONSIDERATION (ECF #204)
MATTHEW F. LEITMAN, District Judge.
On November 29, 2015, Petitioner Omar Rashad Pouncy filed two motions: (1) a motion for access to his counsel by telephone and permission to conduct attorney-client conference calls and (2) a request for immediate consideration of his access motion. (See ECF ## 204, 205.) The Court held an on-the-record telephonic status conference with counsel for all parties on December 17, 2018, in order to resolve Pouncy's access issues. (See ECF #208.) During that call, the parties agreed that Pouncy would be allowed to participate in conference calls with his counsel. Since that time, the Attorney General has confirmed that Pouncy may participate in conference calls with his counsel of record. Accordingly, based on the parties' agreement that Pouncy may participate in conference calls with his counsel of record, the Court DENIES without prejudice Pouncy's currently-pending motions (ECF ## 204 and 205) as moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties and/or counsel of record on January 3, 2019, by electronic means and/or ordinary mail.
Source: Leagle
