Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Smith v. Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency, 18-10162. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan Number: infdco20190111c79 Visitors: 11
Filed: Jan. 10, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 10, 2019
Summary: ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION'S MOTION TO STAY TERRENCE G. BERG , District Judge . Defendant United States Department of Education moved for a stay of this case on December 26, 2018. Congressional appropriations to the Department of Justice lapsed on December 21, 2018. Without an appropriation, in most cases, Department of Justice attorneys are prohibited from working. The Court finds that a thirty-day stay is appropriate under these circumstances. However
More

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION'S MOTION TO STAY

Defendant United States Department of Education moved for a stay of this case on December 26, 2018. Congressional appropriations to the Department of Justice lapsed on December 21, 2018. Without an appropriation, in most cases, Department of Justice attorneys are prohibited from working.

The Court finds that a thirty-day stay is appropriate under these circumstances. However, the Court notes that there is also a reasoned basis for denying all such requests. See In re Petition for a General Order Holding Civil Matters in Abeyance in which the United States is a Party Due to Lapse of Congressional Appropriations, 18-mc-00196 (S.D.W.V. Jan. 2, 2019) (ECF No. 3) (exempting cases before Judge Joseph R. Goodwin from a general order of the Southern District of West Virginia staying all civil matters in which the United States is a party); United States v. Baltimore Police Dep't, 1:17-cv-0099-JKB (D. Md. Dec. 26, 2018) (ECF No, 173) (denying the government's request for a continuance of all dates and deadlines until appropriations are restored). As Judge Goodwin wisely states: "the government should not be given special influence or accommodation in cases where such special considerations are unavailable to other litigants." In re Petition for a General Order, at 1.

After 30 days this stay will be lifted. If at that time the Executive and Legislative branches remain incapable of carrying out their Constitutional duty to promote the general welfare by authorizing the Government to pay the attorneys who represent it, the Court will entertain a motion for entry of default judgment for failure to defend this suit. Mismanagement has consequences.

WHEREFORE, this action is hereby STAYED for a period of 30 days. All dates in the Scheduling Order dated May 10, 2018 (ECF No. 55) will be extended for a period of 30 days.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer