Zack v. McLaren Health Plan, Inc., 17-11253. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20190222b44
Visitors: 1
Filed: Feb. 21, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2019
Summary: ORDER VACATING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE TERRENCE G. BERG , District Judge . On February 12, 2019, the Court ordered Attorney Richard W. Warren to show cause why Rule 11 sanctions should not be imposed and/or why Defendant's Response to Plaintiff's Motion to Reopen Case (ECF No. 27) should not be stricken from the record for containing incorrect assertions. ECF No. 30. Mr. Warren filed his response to the order on February 18, 2019, ECF No. 31. Upon review, the Court finds that Mr. Warren has a
Summary: ORDER VACATING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE TERRENCE G. BERG , District Judge . On February 12, 2019, the Court ordered Attorney Richard W. Warren to show cause why Rule 11 sanctions should not be imposed and/or why Defendant's Response to Plaintiff's Motion to Reopen Case (ECF No. 27) should not be stricken from the record for containing incorrect assertions. ECF No. 30. Mr. Warren filed his response to the order on February 18, 2019, ECF No. 31. Upon review, the Court finds that Mr. Warren has ad..
More
ORDER VACATING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
TERRENCE G. BERG, District Judge.
On February 12, 2019, the Court ordered Attorney Richard W. Warren to show cause why Rule 11 sanctions should not be imposed and/or why Defendant's Response to Plaintiff's Motion to Reopen Case (ECF No. 27) should not be stricken from the record for containing incorrect assertions. ECF No. 30. Mr. Warren filed his response to the order on February 18, 2019, ECF No. 31.
Upon review, the Court finds that Mr. Warren has adequately shown cause that Rule 11 sanctions are not appropriate under all the circumstances. However, it is clear that Defendant's Response to Plaintiff's Motion to Reopen Case, ECF No. 27, nevertheless contains an inaccurate characterization of this Court's previous Order and should therefore be stricken from the record. Accordingly, the docket entry ECF No. 27 is hereby STRICKEN. Defendant may re-file its Response—containing only well-founded assertions—within three (3) days of the date of this Order.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
