U.S. v. Powers, 14-20449. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20190311a38
Visitors: 16
Filed: Mar. 08, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 08, 2019
Summary: ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY LAURIE J. MICHELSON , District Judge . On October 29, 2018, the Court denied Jethro Powers' motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. 2255. (ECF No. 145.) For the reasons set forth in the Opinion and Order, the Court finds that reasonable jurists could not debate whether "the petition should have been resolved in a different manner or that the issues presented were adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further."
Summary: ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY LAURIE J. MICHELSON , District Judge . On October 29, 2018, the Court denied Jethro Powers' motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. 2255. (ECF No. 145.) For the reasons set forth in the Opinion and Order, the Court finds that reasonable jurists could not debate whether "the petition should have been resolved in a different manner or that the issues presented were adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further." ..
More
ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY
LAURIE J. MICHELSON, District Judge.
On October 29, 2018, the Court denied Jethro Powers' motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. (ECF No. 145.)
For the reasons set forth in the Opinion and Order, the Court finds that reasonable jurists could not debate whether "the petition should have been resolved in a different manner or that the issues presented were adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further." Miller—El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003). Jackson has not made a "substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). Thus, a certificate of appealability is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
