Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Mills, 16-20062. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan Number: infdco20190319b27 Visitors: 12
Filed: Mar. 18, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 18, 2019
Summary: ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION [#626] DENISE PAGE HOOD , District Judge . On January 18, 2019, the Court granted Defendant's motion to extend the deadline for filing a 28 U.S.C. 2255 motion in this Court. See Dkt. No. 625. On January 22, 2019, the Government filed a Motion for Reconsideration, Dkt. No. 626, arguing that this Court lacked jurisdiction to grant such relief. The Government correctly relied upon United States v. Asakevich, 810 F.3d 418 , 420-21 (6th Cir. 20
More

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION [#626]

On January 18, 2019, the Court granted Defendant's motion to extend the deadline for filing a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion in this Court. See Dkt. No. 625. On January 22, 2019, the Government filed a Motion for Reconsideration, Dkt. No. 626, arguing that this Court lacked jurisdiction to grant such relief. The Government correctly relied upon United States v. Asakevich, 810 F.3d 418, 420-21 (6th Cir. 2016), wherein the Sixth Circuit held that a district court may toll the statute of limitations for a Section 2255 motion after it had been filed, but it cannot grant an extension of time to file the Section 2255 motion. Accordingly, the Court concludes that it did not have the jurisdiction to grant Defendant an extension of time to file a Section 2255 motion and will vacate its order granting the extension of time to file the Section 2255 motion.

For the reasons stated above,

IT IS ORDERED that the Government's Motion for Reconsideration [Dkt. No. 626] is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court's January 18, 2019 Order Granting Defendant's Motion to Extend Filing Deadline [Dkt. No. 625] is VACATED.

IT IS ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer