Qafko v. Nielsen, 2:17-cv-13916. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20190329e20
Visitors: 19
Filed: Mar. 28, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2019
Summary: ORDER GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER (DE 35) ANTHONY P. PATTI , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the Court for consideration of Defendant's motion for protective order (DE 35), Plaintiff's response (DE 47), Defendant's reply (DE 48), and the parties' joint statement of resolved and unresolved issues (DE 49). This motion was referred to me for hearing and determination (DE 37), and a hearing was held on March 27, 2019, at which the Court entertained oral ar
Summary: ORDER GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER (DE 35) ANTHONY P. PATTI , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the Court for consideration of Defendant's motion for protective order (DE 35), Plaintiff's response (DE 47), Defendant's reply (DE 48), and the parties' joint statement of resolved and unresolved issues (DE 49). This motion was referred to me for hearing and determination (DE 37), and a hearing was held on March 27, 2019, at which the Court entertained oral arg..
More
ORDER GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER (DE 35)
ANTHONY P. PATTI, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the Court for consideration of Defendant's motion for protective order (DE 35), Plaintiff's response (DE 47), Defendant's reply (DE 48), and the parties' joint statement of resolved and unresolved issues (DE 49). This motion was referred to me for hearing and determination (DE 37), and a hearing was held on March 27, 2019, at which the Court entertained oral argument regarding the unresolved issues.
Upon consideration of the motion papers and oral argument, and consistent with the Court's ruling and the parties' stipulation stated on the record, all of which are hereby incorporated by reference as though fully restated herein, Defendant's motion for protective order (DE 35) is GRANTED IN PART. Defendant is directed to submit to the Court a proposed protective order in conformance with the Court's ruling and the parties' stipulation on the record, which Plaintiff's counsel must sign as either "stipulated" or "approved as to form."
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
