Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

MacKenzie v. Barnett, 19-cv-10945. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan Number: infdco20190402c95 Visitors: 8
Filed: Apr. 01, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 01, 2019
Summary: ORDER REGARDING REMOVAL MATTHEW F. LEITMAN , District Judge . This matter was removed to this Court on March 29, 2019. See Notice of Removal (Dkt. #1). Within five (5) days of today's date, the parties shall file with this Court — as separate docket entries — all answers, amended pleadings, responsive pleadings, pending motions, and responses/replies to those motions that were originally filed in state court. The Court generally will not consider any unresolved motions pending in state c
More

ORDER REGARDING REMOVAL

This matter was removed to this Court on March 29, 2019. See Notice of Removal (Dkt. #1). Within five (5) days of today's date, the parties shall file with this Court — as separate docket entries — all answers, amended pleadings, responsive pleadings, pending motions, and responses/replies to those motions that were originally filed in state court. The Court generally will not consider any unresolved motions pending in state court at the time of removal, unless they have been re-filed on this Court's docket and using this Court's case caption. The same is true for any responses or replies that had been filed in state court in connection with motions not yet resolved at the time of removal. Each party is responsible for the docketing of its own documents with this Court.

To the extent briefing has not been completed on a pending motion at the time of removal, the briefing schedule set forth in Local Rule 7.1(e) applies upon docketing with this Court, unless the Court orders otherwise.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer