Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Rhodes v. Equifax Information Services, LLC, 18-cv-12951. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan Number: infdco20190502g82 Visitors: 16
Filed: May 01, 2019
Latest Update: May 01, 2019
Summary: ORDER DISMISSING WITHOUT PREJUDICE DEFENDANT DEBT RECOVERY SOLUTIONS, LLC MATTHEW F. LEITMAN , District Judge . On or around August 6, 2018, Plaintiff Chardai Rhodes filed this action against four Defendants — Equifax Information Services, LLC ("Equifax"), Commonwealth Financial Systems, Inc. ("Commonwealth"), Jefferson Capital Systems, LLC ("Jefferson Capital"), and Debt Recovery Solutions, LLC ("Debt Recovery") — in the State of Michigan 37th Judicial District Court, Warren Division. ( S
More

ORDER DISMISSING WITHOUT PREJUDICE DEFENDANT DEBT RECOVERY SOLUTIONS, LLC

On or around August 6, 2018, Plaintiff Chardai Rhodes filed this action against four Defendants — Equifax Information Services, LLC ("Equifax"), Commonwealth Financial Systems, Inc. ("Commonwealth"), Jefferson Capital Systems, LLC ("Jefferson Capital"), and Debt Recovery Solutions, LLC ("Debt Recovery") — in the State of Michigan 37th Judicial District Court, Warren Division. (See Compl., ECF #1-2.) Defendants Commonwealth and Jefferson Capital removed the matter to this Court on September 20, 2018. (Notice of Removal, ECF #1.) After the matter was removed, three of the Defendants answered Plaintiff's complaint. (See Equifax's Answer at ECF #5; Jefferson Capital's Answer at ECF #7; Commonwealth's Answer at ECF 38.) Defendant Debt Recovery has not filed an Answer. Furthermore, Plaintiff has not filed or served a notice of default against Defendant Debt Recovery. Accordingly, on March 19, 2019, this Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause in writing why the case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute, pursuant to Local Rule 41.2. (Order, ECF #11.) On April 2, 2019, Plaintiff responded that while Debt Recovery had not yet responded to the complaint, Plaintiff "agreed to allow Debt Recovery fourteen (14) days from today to file its response to its complaint." (Resp., ECF #12.)

It has been more than 14 days, and no additional developments have occurred in Plaintiff's case against Debt Recovery. Therefore, pursuant to Local Rule 41.2, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Debt Recovery be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for Plaintiff's failure to prosecute.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer