Robinson v. Pittsfield Charter Township, 18-13290. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20190624a20
Visitors: 9
Filed: Jun. 21, 2019
Latest Update: Jun. 21, 2019
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE SEAN F. COX , District Judge . On October 22, 2018, pro se Plaintiff Christopher Bernard Robinson ("Robinson") filed this action against Defendants. The matter was referred to Magistrate Judge David R. Grand for all pretrial proceedings. Thereafter, Defendants filed motions to dismiss. After the motions were briefed, on May 29, 2019, the magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 31) wherein
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE SEAN F. COX , District Judge . On October 22, 2018, pro se Plaintiff Christopher Bernard Robinson ("Robinson") filed this action against Defendants. The matter was referred to Magistrate Judge David R. Grand for all pretrial proceedings. Thereafter, Defendants filed motions to dismiss. After the motions were briefed, on May 29, 2019, the magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 31) wherein h..
More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
SEAN F. COX, District Judge.
On October 22, 2018, pro se Plaintiff Christopher Bernard Robinson ("Robinson") filed this action against Defendants.
The matter was referred to Magistrate Judge David R. Grand for all pretrial proceedings. Thereafter, Defendants filed motions to dismiss. After the motions were briefed, on May 29, 2019, the magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 31) wherein he recommends that the Court grant the three motions to dismiss and dismiss this action with prejudice.
The time permitted for the parties to file objections to that Report and Recommendation has passed and no objections were filed.
Accordingly, the Court hereby ADOPTS the May 29, 2019 Report and Recommendation and ORDERS that Defendants' Motions to Dismiss (ECF Nos. 16, 18 & 20) are GRANTED and this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
