Roseman v. International Union, 18-13042. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20190627a80
Visitors: 6
Filed: Jun. 26, 2019
Latest Update: Jun. 26, 2019
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, DENYING DEFENDANT UAW'S MOTION TO DISMISS, AND DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DIRECTED VERDICT DAVID M. LAWSON , District Judge . Presently before the Court is the report issued on June 5, 2019 by Magistrate Judge David R. Grand pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), recommending that the Court deny defendant UAW's motion to dismiss and the plaintiff's motion for a directed verdict on his claims against the union. Although the report stated that the parti
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, DENYING DEFENDANT UAW'S MOTION TO DISMISS, AND DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DIRECTED VERDICT DAVID M. LAWSON , District Judge . Presently before the Court is the report issued on June 5, 2019 by Magistrate Judge David R. Grand pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), recommending that the Court deny defendant UAW's motion to dismiss and the plaintiff's motion for a directed verdict on his claims against the union. Although the report stated that the partie..
More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, DENYING DEFENDANT UAW'S MOTION TO DISMISS, AND DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DIRECTED VERDICT
DAVID M. LAWSON, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is the report issued on June 5, 2019 by Magistrate Judge David R. Grand pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), recommending that the Court deny defendant UAW's motion to dismiss and the plaintiff's motion for a directed verdict on his claims against the union. Although the report stated that the parties to this action could object to and seek review of the recommendation within fourteen days of service of the report, no objections have been filed thus far. The parties' failure to file objections to the report and recommendation waives any further right to appeal. Smith v. Detroit Fed'n of Teachers Local 231, 829 F.2d 1370, 1373 (6th Cir. 1987). Likewise, the failure to object to the magistrate judge's report releases the Court from its duty to independently review the matter. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). However, the Court agrees with the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the report and recommendation (ECF No. 66) is ADOPTED. The plaintiff's motion for directed verdict (ECF No. 62) and defendant UAW's motion to dismiss (ECF No. 58) are DENIED.
Source: Leagle
