Dougherty v. Esperion Therapeutics, Inc., 16-10089. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20190731c52
Visitors: 13
Filed: Jul. 30, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 30, 2019
Summary: ORDER R. STEVEN WHALEN , Magistrate Judge . For the reasons stated on the record on July 25, 2019, Plaintiff's Motion to Challenge Defendants' Confidentiality Designations [Doc. #69] is GRANTED. Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(a), any objections to this Order must be filed within 14 days of the date of this Order. 1 This Order is STAYED for 14 days, or until further order of the District Judge assigned to this case. The hearing on this motion, conducted on July 25, 2019, including written tr
Summary: ORDER R. STEVEN WHALEN , Magistrate Judge . For the reasons stated on the record on July 25, 2019, Plaintiff's Motion to Challenge Defendants' Confidentiality Designations [Doc. #69] is GRANTED. Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(a), any objections to this Order must be filed within 14 days of the date of this Order. 1 This Order is STAYED for 14 days, or until further order of the District Judge assigned to this case. The hearing on this motion, conducted on July 25, 2019, including written tra..
More
ORDER
R. STEVEN WHALEN, Magistrate Judge.
For the reasons stated on the record on July 25, 2019, Plaintiff's Motion to Challenge Defendants' Confidentiality Designations [Doc. #69] is GRANTED.
Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(a), any objections to this Order must be filed within 14 days of the date of this Order.1 This Order is STAYED for 14 days, or until further order of the District Judge assigned to this case.
The hearing on this motion, conducted on July 25, 2019, including written transcriptions and electronic recordings of the hearing, is SEALED until further order of the Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. A district judge may reconsider a magistrate judge's non-dispositive order "where it has been shown that the magistrate judge's order is clearly erroneous or contrary to law." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A).
Source: Leagle
