Heard v. Strange, 17-13904. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20190801b21
Visitors: 11
Filed: Jul. 31, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 31, 2019
Summary: ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION [66] NANCY G. EDMUNDS , District Judge . The matter is currently before the Court on Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration of a previously issued opinion and order accepting the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation. (Dkt. 66.) Plaintiff notes that the Court's opinion stated that no party had filed objections when he in fact did file objections. Plaintiff's timely objections were not entered on the docket until June 4, 2019, the s
Summary: ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION [66] NANCY G. EDMUNDS , District Judge . The matter is currently before the Court on Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration of a previously issued opinion and order accepting the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation. (Dkt. 66.) Plaintiff notes that the Court's opinion stated that no party had filed objections when he in fact did file objections. Plaintiff's timely objections were not entered on the docket until June 4, 2019, the sa..
More
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION [66]
NANCY G. EDMUNDS, District Judge.
The matter is currently before the Court on Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration of a previously issued opinion and order accepting the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation. (Dkt. 66.) Plaintiff notes that the Court's opinion stated that no party had filed objections when he in fact did file objections. Plaintiff's timely objections were not entered on the docket until June 4, 2019, the same day the Court issued its opinion. The Court has since withdrawn that opinion. (See dkt. 65.) The Court has entered on this date an opinion and order addressing all of Plaintiff's objections and overruling them. Therefore, Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration is DENIED as moot.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
