MATTHEW F. LEITMAN, District Judge.
The United States, by and through its attorneys, Matthew Schneider, United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Michigan, and Gjon Juncaj, Assistant United States Attorney, together with Defendant Timothy P. Rembert-Scroggins, individually and by and through his attorney, Richard Korn, submit this Stipulated Preliminary Order of Forfeiture to the Court and stipulate and agree to the following:
1. The United States filed a First Superseding Information on May 30, 2019, which charged defendant with Counts One and Two, Prohibited Person in Possession of a Firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). The First Superseding Information contains forfeiture allegations providing, inter alia, notice that upon conviction of the alleged offenses, the United States will seek to forfeit any firearm or ammunition involved in the offense, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 924(d)(1). (ECF No. 27)
2. The United States filed a First Forfeiture Bill of Particulars on June 7, 2019 (ECF. No. 29) pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 7(f), to provide notice of specific property the Government intends to forfeit upon conviction:
3. On June 6, 2019, the defendant pled guilty to Count Two of the First Superseding Information, which charges him with being a prohibited person in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). (ECF No. 32) Specifically, the Defendant pled guilty to possessing the Smith and Wesson 3914 Pistol CAL:9 SN: VAA1832 ("Smith and Wesson Firearm").
4. In Defendant's Rule 11 Plea Agreement ("Rule 11"), pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 924(d), Defendant agreed to the forfeiture of the firearm and ammunition involved in his violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). The parties agree that the Rule 11 forfeiture agreement incorrectly cited the Taurus International PT111 Millennium G2 Pistol CAL:9 SN:TKS28146 as the firearm to be forfeited for his Count Two violation. (ECF No. 32 at 4). This Stipulation correctly provides for the criminal forfeiture of the Smith and Wesson Firearm and ammunition. Consistent with the intent of the Rule 11 agreement, this Stipulation also provides for the administrative disposition of the remaining seized firearm not being forfeited in these criminal proceedings.
5. In the Rule 11, Defendant agreed to the entry of one or more orders of forfeiture of his interests in such property upon application by the United States at, or any time before, his sentencing in his case.
6. In entering into this Stipulation, Defendant agrees to forfeit, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 924(d), the following firearm and ammunition involved in his violation of Count Two of the First Superseding Information:
7. In entering into this Stipulation, Defendant also waives notice of and consents to the administrative forfeiture of one (1) Taurus, Model Millennium G2 PT111, 9mm caliber semi-automatic pistol bearing serial number TKS28146 ("Taurus Firearm") seized from Defendant on or about November 30, 2018. Alternatively, the Defendant hereby abandons any interest he may have in the Taurus Firearm and consents to the destruction of the firearm.
8. In entering into this Stipulation, Defendant agrees to sign any forms necessary to complete the administrative forfeiture or abandonment and destruction of the Taurus firearm.
9. In entering into this Stipulation with respect to forfeiture, Defendant expressly waives the requirements of Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure 32.2 and 43(a) regarding notice of forfeiture in the charging instrument, pronouncement of forfeiture at sentencing and incorporation of forfeiture in the judgment and agrees to immediate entry of this Stipulated Preliminary Order of Forfeiture. Defendant further agrees that this Order shall become final as to Defendant at entry. Defendant also expressly waives his right, if any, to have a jury determine the forfeitability of his interest in the Subject Property.
10. In entering into this Stipulation with respect to forfeiture, Defendant acknowledges that he understands that forfeiture of the Smith and Wesson Firearm and ammunition is part of the sentence that may be imposed on him in this case and waives his right to challenge any failure by the Court to advise him of this at the time that his guilty plea is accepted pursuant to Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure 11(b)(1)(J).
11. In entering into this Stipulation with respect to forfeiture, Defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waives any challenge to forfeiture of the Subject Property based upon the Excessive Fines Clause of the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution.
Based on the First Superseding Information, the Rule 11 Plea Agreement, this Stipulation, and other information in the record, and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 924(d), the Subject Property
Agreed as to form and substance: