American Vehicular Sciences LLC v. Toyota Motor Corporation, 16-cv-11531. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20190930c49
Visitors: 18
Filed: Sep. 27, 2019
Latest Update: Sep. 27, 2019
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [60] JUDITH E. LEVY , District Judge . Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Patti's Report and Recommendation recommending the Court deny Defendants' motion for attorney fees and costs. (ECF No. 60.) The parties were required to file specific written objections within 14 days of service. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2); E.D. Mich. L.R. 72.1(d). No objections were filed. The Court has nevertheless carefully reviewed the Report and Recommendation and concurs
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [60] JUDITH E. LEVY , District Judge . Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Patti's Report and Recommendation recommending the Court deny Defendants' motion for attorney fees and costs. (ECF No. 60.) The parties were required to file specific written objections within 14 days of service. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2); E.D. Mich. L.R. 72.1(d). No objections were filed. The Court has nevertheless carefully reviewed the Report and Recommendation and concurs ..
More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [60]
JUDITH E. LEVY, District Judge.
Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Patti's Report and Recommendation recommending the Court deny Defendants' motion for attorney fees and costs. (ECF No. 60.) The parties were required to file specific written objections within 14 days of service. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2); E.D. Mich. L.R. 72.1(d). No objections were filed. The Court has nevertheless carefully reviewed the Report and Recommendation and concurs in the reasoning and result. Accordingly,
The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 60) is ADOPTED; and
Defendants' Motion for attorney fees and costs (ECF No. 38) is DENIED.1
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. By failing to object to the Report and Recommendation, the parties have waived any further right of appeal. United States v. Archibald, 589 F.3d 289, 295-96 (6th Cir. 2009).
Source: Leagle
