Pouncy v. Palmer, 13-cv-14695. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20191018b18
Visitors: 5
Filed: Oct. 17, 2019
Latest Update: Oct. 17, 2019
Summary: ORDER DENYING PETITIONER'S RENEWED MOTION FOR RESPONDENT TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING INTERFERENCE WITH ATTORNEY-CLIENT COMMUNICATION (ECF No. 231) MATTHEW F. LEITMAN , District Judge . On May 3, 2019, Petitioner Omar Pouncy filed a renewed Motion for Respondent to Show Cause Regarding Interference with Attorney-Client Communication (ECF No. 231). For the reasons explained on the record on October 16, 2019 (in the context of a discussion of a related motion that raised the same or similar issue
Summary: ORDER DENYING PETITIONER'S RENEWED MOTION FOR RESPONDENT TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING INTERFERENCE WITH ATTORNEY-CLIENT COMMUNICATION (ECF No. 231) MATTHEW F. LEITMAN , District Judge . On May 3, 2019, Petitioner Omar Pouncy filed a renewed Motion for Respondent to Show Cause Regarding Interference with Attorney-Client Communication (ECF No. 231). For the reasons explained on the record on October 16, 2019 (in the context of a discussion of a related motion that raised the same or similar issues..
More
ORDER DENYING PETITIONER'S RENEWED MOTION FOR RESPONDENT TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING INTERFERENCE WITH ATTORNEY-CLIENT COMMUNICATION (ECF No. 231)
MATTHEW F. LEITMAN, District Judge.
On May 3, 2019, Petitioner Omar Pouncy filed a renewed Motion for Respondent to Show Cause Regarding Interference with Attorney-Client Communication (ECF No. 231). For the reasons explained on the record on October 16, 2019 (in the context of a discussion of a related motion that raised the same or similar issues), the Court is not yet persuaded to grant Petitioner's requested relief. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Petitioner's Motion is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
