JUDITH E. LEVY, District Judge.
The Court held a status conference regarding its pending Flint water litigation on December 10, 2019. The Court now orders as follows:
During the status conference, several Defendants raised concerns with the current allocation of time during certain depositions. As an interim measure, the Court allotted one additional hour during depositions to both Plaintiffs and Defendants.
The Court will hold a discovery telephone conference call on Wednesday, December 18, 2019 at 2:00pm. To request that a discovery issue be added to the agenda, parties must follow the discovery dispute protocol outlined in the Second Amended Case Management Order. (ECF No. 998, PageID.25963-PageID.25965.)
The Court will issue an order to show cause in all individual Flint Water Cases as to why certain Defendants should not be dismissed.
The Court heard oral argument on the pending motions to dismiss in Chapman v. Snyder (Case No. 18-cv-10679, ECF No. 49, 50, 51) and Alexander v. Flint. (Case No. 16-cv-13421, ECF No. 150.) Plaintiffs' counsel in Chapman did not appear at this status conference. However, the Court was informed by Defendants' counsel that the parties reached an agreement on their pending motions to dismiss, and so the parties are instructed to file any necessary documents by Friday, December 13, 2019. Any additional motions to dismiss in this case must be filed by January 10, 2020.
In Alexander, the Court heard argument on both VNA Defendants' motion to dismiss (Case No. 16-cv-13421, ECF No. 150) and Alexander Plaintiffs' motion to amend their complaint. (Case No. 16-cv-13421, ECF No. 156.) For the reasons set forth on the record, VNA Defendants' motion to dismiss is granted. As for Plaintiffs' motion to amend their complaint, it was improperly filed without a proposed amended pleading as required by Local Rule 15.1. Regardless, Plaintiffs' motion to amend is denied. At the hearing, Plaintiffs' counsel stated that he did not know whether an amendment would fix the deficiency identified by VNA Defendants in their motion to dismiss. Furthermore, the same fraud and reliance issue was addressed in Carthan where the Court indicated that its ruling "does not foreclose a fraud claim against Veolia by other plaintiffs. However, those plaintiffs must plead the necessary elements of their fraud claim with particularity, including their reliance on Veolia's allegedly fraudulent statements." Carthan v. Snyder, 329 F.Supp.3d 369, 420 (E.D. Mich. 2018) (emphasis in the original). Despite this warning, Plaintiffs amended their complaint on November 6, 2018 (Case No. 16cv-13421, ECF No. 122), and did not include allegations showing that any of the Plaintiffs actually relied on statements made by VNA Defendants. For these reasons as well as those set forth on the record, Plaintiffs' motion is denied.
At the November 2019 status conference, the Court appointed a committee of lawyers to develop a proposal for the second bellwether pool selection process. The committee requested and the Court granted extra time to prepare this proposal. The new deadline is January 15, 2020, and no further extensions will be granted.
The next status conference will be held on Wednesday, January 22, 2020 at 2:00pm in Ann Arbor, Michigan. Parties are to file proposed agenda items in Case No. 16-cv-10444 by January 8, 2020. Individual liaison counsel should collect proposed agenda items from all counsel representing individual plaintiffs and submit those proposed items as a single filing. The Court will issue an agenda by January 15, 2020.
IT IS SO ORDERED.