Mohammed v. Seastar, LLC, 18-13500. (2020)
Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20200121f99
Visitors: 4
Filed: Jan. 17, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 17, 2020
Summary: ORDER STAYING AND ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSING CASE ROBERT H. CLELAND , District Judge . Plaintiff Ali Atia Mohammed brings this claim related to a shipping container in transit to Kuwait. The parties have informed the court that they have reached a settlement, conditioned on the return of the container at issue to the United States. In order for the container to be returned, the parties must obtain approval from Kuwaiti customs to re-export the container, a process that the parties assert they
Summary: ORDER STAYING AND ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSING CASE ROBERT H. CLELAND , District Judge . Plaintiff Ali Atia Mohammed brings this claim related to a shipping container in transit to Kuwait. The parties have informed the court that they have reached a settlement, conditioned on the return of the container at issue to the United States. In order for the container to be returned, the parties must obtain approval from Kuwaiti customs to re-export the container, a process that the parties assert they ..
More
ORDER STAYING AND ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSING CASE
ROBERT H. CLELAND, District Judge.
Plaintiff Ali Atia Mohammed brings this claim related to a shipping container in transit to Kuwait. The parties have informed the court that they have reached a settlement, conditioned on the return of the container at issue to the United States. In order for the container to be returned, the parties must obtain approval from Kuwaiti customs to re-export the container, a process that the parties assert they have already commenced. While the parties wait for such approval, the court will administratively close this case for statistical purposes. The case may be reopened upon the filing of a notice by any party on the docket for this case. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that the case is STAYED. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to administratively close this case for statistical purposes only. Nothing in this order should be construed as an adjudication of any party's claims, counter-claims, or cross-claims.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff submit an update to the court or, if it wishes to pursue the case, a notice to lift the stay within 90 days of the entry of this order.
Source: Leagle
