Powell v. Kowalski, 17-cv-11756. (2020)
Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20200211d26
Visitors: 14
Filed: Feb. 10, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 10, 2020
Summary: JUDGMENT MATTHEW F. LEITMAN , District Judge . In accordance with the Opinion and Order entered on February 10, 2020, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a Certificate of Appealability is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that permission to appeal in forma pauperis is GRANTED. FootNotes 1. The Court amends the caption to reflect the name of Powell's current warden. See Rule 2(
Summary: JUDGMENT MATTHEW F. LEITMAN , District Judge . In accordance with the Opinion and Order entered on February 10, 2020, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a Certificate of Appealability is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that permission to appeal in forma pauperis is GRANTED. FootNotes 1. The Court amends the caption to reflect the name of Powell's current warden. See Rule 2(a..
More
JUDGMENT
MATTHEW F. LEITMAN, District Judge.
In accordance with the Opinion and Order entered on February 10, 2020,
IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a Certificate of Appealability is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that permission to appeal in forma pauperis is GRANTED.
FootNotes
1. The Court amends the caption to reflect the name of Powell's current warden. See Rule 2(a) of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases, 28 U.S.C. foll. § 2254.
Source: Leagle
