United States v. Horton, 19-cr-20542. (2020)
Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20200221b41
Visitors: 21
Filed: Feb. 20, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 20, 2020
Summary: ORDER DENYING MOTIONS TO SUPPRESS (ECF Nos. 16, 17) MATTHEW F. LEITMAN , District Judge . Two Motions to Suppress have been filed in this case: one by Defendant (ECF No. 16), and one by Defendant's counsel (ECF No. 17). The Court held a hearing on the motions on February 20, 2020. For the reasons stated on the record, the motions are DENIED to the extent that they seek suppression of the firearm recovered by the investigating officers. In addition, the motions are DENIED AS MOOT to the
Summary: ORDER DENYING MOTIONS TO SUPPRESS (ECF Nos. 16, 17) MATTHEW F. LEITMAN , District Judge . Two Motions to Suppress have been filed in this case: one by Defendant (ECF No. 16), and one by Defendant's counsel (ECF No. 17). The Court held a hearing on the motions on February 20, 2020. For the reasons stated on the record, the motions are DENIED to the extent that they seek suppression of the firearm recovered by the investigating officers. In addition, the motions are DENIED AS MOOT to the ..
More
ORDER DENYING MOTIONS TO SUPPRESS (ECF Nos. 16, 17)
MATTHEW F. LEITMAN, District Judge.
Two Motions to Suppress have been filed in this case: one by Defendant (ECF No. 16), and one by Defendant's counsel (ECF No. 17). The Court held a hearing on the motions on February 20, 2020. For the reasons stated on the record, the motions are DENIED to the extent that they seek suppression of the firearm recovered by the investigating officers. In addition, the motions are DENIED AS MOOT to the extent they seek suppression of the brass knuckles seized from the Defendant because the Government has indicated it will not seek to admit them as evidence at trial.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
