Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. MESHIGAUD, 2:12-cr-11. (2012)

Court: District Court, W.D. Michigan Number: infdco20120628a82 Visitors: 14
Filed: Jun. 05, 2012
Latest Update: Jun. 05, 2012
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TIMOTHY P. GREELEY, Magistrate Judge. Pursuant to W.D. MICH. L.CR.R. 11.1, I conducted a plea hearing in the captioned case on June 5, 2012, after receiving the written consent of defendant and all counsel. At the hearing, defendant CHRISTY RENEE MESHIGAUD entered a plea of guilty to Count 2 of the Indictment, charging defendant with Distribution of Cocaine Base (Crack Cocaine) within 1,000 Feet of a School in violation of 21 U.S.C. Sections 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(C) a
More

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

TIMOTHY P. GREELEY, Magistrate Judge.

Pursuant to W.D. MICH. L.CR.R. 11.1, I conducted a plea hearing in the captioned case on June 5, 2012, after receiving the written consent of defendant and all counsel. At the hearing, defendant CHRISTY RENEE MESHIGAUD entered a plea of guilty to Count 2 of the Indictment, charging defendant with Distribution of Cocaine Base (Crack Cocaine) within 1,000 Feet of a School in violation of 21 U.S.C. Sections 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(C) and 860(a), in exchange for the undertakings made by the government in the written plea agreement. On the basis of the record made at the hearing, I find that defendant is fully capable and competent to enter an informed plea; that the plea is made knowingly and with full understanding of each of the rights waived by defendant; that it is made voluntarily and free from any force, threats, or promises, apart from the promises in the plea agreement; that the defendant understands the nature of the charge and penalties provided by law; and that the plea has a sufficient basis in fact.

I therefore recommend that defendant's plea of guilty to Count 2 of the Indictment be accepted, that the court adjudicate defendant guilty, and that the written plea agreement be considered for acceptance at the time of sentencing. It is further recommended that the order setting conditions of defendant's release remain in effect pending sentencing. Acceptance of the plea, adjudication of guilt, acceptance of the plea agreement, determination of defendant's status pending sentencing, and imposition of sentence are specifically reserved for the district judge.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer