Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. GREENWOOD, 1:08-CR-54. (2012)

Court: District Court, W.D. Michigan Number: infdco20120718888 Visitors: 11
Filed: Jul. 17, 2012
Latest Update: Jul. 17, 2012
Summary: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ROBERT HOLMES BELL, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on defendant's Motion for Modification or Reduction of Sentence Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (docket #54). Based on a review of defendant's motion, the Sentence Modification Report, submissions by counsel on behalf of the defendant and the government, and the original criminal file, the Court has determined that the motion should be denied for the following reason(s): Defendant was sentenced
More

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ROBERT HOLMES BELL, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on defendant's Motion for Modification or Reduction of Sentence Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3582(c)(2) (docket #54). Based on a review of defendant's motion, the Sentence Modification Report, submissions by counsel on behalf of the defendant and the government, and the original criminal file, the Court has determined that the motion should be denied for the following reason(s):

Defendant was sentenced on September 12, 2008, to a total term of custody of 132 months after pleading guilty to Possession with Intent to Distribute an Unspecified Amount of Cocaine Base contrary to 21 U.S.C. §841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(C) (Count 2), and Possession of a Firearm in Furtherance of a Drug Trafficking Crime in violation of 18 U.S.C. §924(c)(1)(A)(i) (Count 3).

Defendant has an extensive criminal history which includes 18 criminal convictions. His post-sentencing conduct, as detailed in the Sentence Modification Report, includes being Insolent Toward Staff and Threatening Bodily Harm.

The granting of a reduction in sentence pursuant to a Section 3582(c)(2) motion is discretionary with the Court. United States v. Ursery, 109 F.3d 1129, 1137 (6th Cir.1997). Due to defendant's extensive criminal history, his post-sentencing conduct, and the public safety factors that the Court has to be mindful of, the Court will DENY defendant's motion for reduction.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer