SNYDER v. AMEEL, 1:11-cv-01325. (2012)
Court: District Court, W.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20120810770
Visitors: 10
Filed: Jul. 17, 2012
Latest Update: Jul. 17, 2012
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ELLEN S. CARMODY, Magistrate Judge. On May 18, 2012, the Clerk mailed a copy of the May 17, 2012 Case Management Order (Dkt. 14) to Plaintiff. The mailing was not deliverable because Plaintiff has not provided the Court with an updated address (Dkt. 18). As such, the undersigned hereby recommends that this matter be dismissed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) and W.D.Mich. L.Civ.R. 41.1 for want of prosecution and failure to comply with the rules and orders of this
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ELLEN S. CARMODY, Magistrate Judge. On May 18, 2012, the Clerk mailed a copy of the May 17, 2012 Case Management Order (Dkt. 14) to Plaintiff. The mailing was not deliverable because Plaintiff has not provided the Court with an updated address (Dkt. 18). As such, the undersigned hereby recommends that this matter be dismissed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) and W.D.Mich. L.Civ.R. 41.1 for want of prosecution and failure to comply with the rules and orders of this c..
More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
ELLEN S. CARMODY, Magistrate Judge.
On May 18, 2012, the Clerk mailed a copy of the May 17, 2012 Case Management Order (Dkt. 14) to Plaintiff. The mailing was not deliverable because Plaintiff has not provided the Court with an updated address (Dkt. 18).
As such, the undersigned hereby recommends that this matter be dismissed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) and W.D.Mich. L.Civ.R. 41.1 for want of prosecution and failure to comply with the rules and orders of this court. Local Rule 41.1 states in pertinent part, "Failure of a plaintiff to keep the Court apprised of a current address shall be grounds for dismissal for want of prosecution." Timely objections to this Report and Recommendation shall be considered Plaintiff's opportunity to show cause why this matter should not be dismissed.
Source: Leagle
