BASKIN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 1:13-CV-961. (2014)
Court: District Court, W.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20140514d04
Visitors: 4
Filed: May 13, 2014
Latest Update: May 13, 2014
Summary: ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ROBERT HOLMES BELL, District Judge. On April 16, 2014, Magistrate Judge Joseph G. Scoville issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") (ECF No. 24) recommending that Plaintiff's motion for attorney fees (ECF No. 22) under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. 2412(d)(1)(A), be granted in part and denied in part. No objections have been filed, and the deadline for doing so has expired. The Court has reviewed the ma
Summary: ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ROBERT HOLMES BELL, District Judge. On April 16, 2014, Magistrate Judge Joseph G. Scoville issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") (ECF No. 24) recommending that Plaintiff's motion for attorney fees (ECF No. 22) under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. 2412(d)(1)(A), be granted in part and denied in part. No objections have been filed, and the deadline for doing so has expired. The Court has reviewed the mat..
More
ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
ROBERT HOLMES BELL, District Judge.
On April 16, 2014, Magistrate Judge Joseph G. Scoville issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") (ECF No. 24) recommending that Plaintiff's motion for attorney fees (ECF No. 22) under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A), be granted in part and denied in part. No objections have been filed, and the deadline for doing so has expired. The Court has reviewed the matter and concludes that the R&R correctly analyzes the issues and makes a sound recommendation.
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's April 16, 2014, R&R (Dkt. No. 24) is APPROVED and ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees (Dkt. No. 22) is GRANTED-IN-PART and DENIED-IN-PART.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant remit two thousand, four hundred, thirtyseven dollars and fifty cents ($2,437.50) in fees and that such be paid directly to Plaintiff.
Source: Leagle
