Pinnace v. Prelesnik, 1:11-CV-749. (2014)
Court: District Court, W.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20140516896
Visitors: 16
Filed: May 15, 2014
Latest Update: May 15, 2014
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION GORDON J. QUIST, District Judge. The court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation by the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, which was served on Petitioner on April 16, 2014. No objections have been filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b). THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, filed April 16, 2014, is approved and adopted as the opinion of the court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner's
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION GORDON J. QUIST, District Judge. The court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation by the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, which was served on Petitioner on April 16, 2014. No objections have been filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b). THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, filed April 16, 2014, is approved and adopted as the opinion of the court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner's h..
More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
GORDON J. QUIST, District Judge.
The court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation by the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, which was served on Petitioner on April 16, 2014. No objections have been filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b).
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, filed April 16, 2014, is approved and adopted as the opinion of the court.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner's habeas corpus petition is DENIED.
This case is concluded.
Source: Leagle
