U.S. v. ROSENGREN, 1:14-cr-72. (2014)
Court: District Court, W.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20150102859
Visitors: 28
Filed: Dec. 31, 2014
Latest Update: Dec. 31, 2014
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION PAUL L. MALONEY, Chief District Judge. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation filed by United States Magistrate Judge Hugh W. Brenneman, Jr. in this action (ECF No. 234). The Report and Recommendation was duly served on the parties, and no objection has been made thereto within the time required by law. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is approved and adopted as the opinion of the C
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION PAUL L. MALONEY, Chief District Judge. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation filed by United States Magistrate Judge Hugh W. Brenneman, Jr. in this action (ECF No. 234). The Report and Recommendation was duly served on the parties, and no objection has been made thereto within the time required by law. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is approved and adopted as the opinion of the Co..
More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
PAUL L. MALONEY, Chief District Judge.
The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation filed by United States Magistrate Judge Hugh W. Brenneman, Jr. in this action (ECF No. 234). The Report and Recommendation was duly served on the parties, and no objection has been made thereto within the time required by law.
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that:
1. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is approved and adopted as the opinion of the Court.
2. Defendant's plea of guilty is accepted and defendant is adjudicated guilty of the charges set forth in the Superseding Information.
3. The written plea agreement is hereby continued under advisement pending sentencing.
Source: Leagle
