Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

SLEIGHTER v. COUNTY OF KENT, 1:13-cv-01360. (2015)

Court: District Court, W.D. Michigan Number: infdco20150302944 Visitors: 5
Filed: Feb. 05, 2015
Latest Update: Feb. 05, 2015
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ELLEN S. CARMODY , Magistrate Judge . On January 8, 2015, Plaintiff was ordered to "show cause in writing by January 22, 2015 why this matter should not be dismissed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) and W.D.Mich. L.Civ.R. 41.1 for want of prosecution and failure to comply with the rules and orders of this court." No response to the order has been filed. As such, the undersigned hereby recommends that this matter be dismissed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) and
More

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

On January 8, 2015, Plaintiff was ordered to "show cause in writing by January 22, 2015 why this matter should not be dismissed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) and W.D.Mich. L.Civ.R. 41.1 for want of prosecution and failure to comply with the rules and orders of this court." No response to the order has been filed.

As such, the undersigned hereby recommends that this matter be dismissed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) and W.D.Mich. L.Civ.R. 41.1 for want of prosecution and failure to comply with the rules and orders of this court. Timely objections to this Report and Recommendation shall be considered Plaintiff's opportunity to show cause why this matter should not be dismissed.

OBJECTIONS to this Report and Recommendation must be filed with the Clerk of Court within ten (10) days of the date of service of this notice. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). Failure to file objections within the specified time waives the right to appeal the District Court's order. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 155 (1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947, 949-50 (6th Cir. 1981).

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer