U.S. v. CANALES-MEDINA, 1:15-cr-00063. (2015)
Court: District Court, W.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20150602c78
Visitors: 20
Filed: May 12, 2015
Latest Update: May 12, 2015
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ELLEN S. CARMODY , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to W.D. MICH. L.CR.R. 11.1, I conducted a plea hearing in the captioned case on May 11, 2015, after receiving the written consent of defendant and all counsel. There is no written plea agreement. At the hearing, defendant Julio Omar Canales-Medina entered a plea of guilty to the Indictment charging defendant with being present in the United States without the permission of the Attorney General after having been convic
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ELLEN S. CARMODY , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to W.D. MICH. L.CR.R. 11.1, I conducted a plea hearing in the captioned case on May 11, 2015, after receiving the written consent of defendant and all counsel. There is no written plea agreement. At the hearing, defendant Julio Omar Canales-Medina entered a plea of guilty to the Indictment charging defendant with being present in the United States without the permission of the Attorney General after having been convict..
More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
ELLEN S. CARMODY, Magistrate Judge.
Pursuant to W.D. MICH. L.CR.R. 11.1, I conducted a plea hearing in the captioned case on May 11, 2015, after receiving the written consent of defendant and all counsel. There is no written plea agreement. At the hearing, defendant Julio Omar Canales-Medina entered a plea of guilty to the Indictment charging defendant with being present in the United States without the permission of the Attorney General after having been convicted of a felony in violation of 8 U.S.C. §§ 1326(a) and (b)(1). On the basis of the record made at the hearing, I find that defendant is fully capable and competent to enter an informed plea; that the plea is made knowingly and with full understanding of each of the rights waived by defendant; that it is made voluntarily and free from any force, threats, or promises; that the defendant understands the nature of the charge and penalties provided by law; and that the plea has a sufficient basis in fact.
I therefore recommend that defendant's plea of guilty to the Indictment be accepted, and that the court adjudicate defendant guilty. Acceptance of the plea, adjudication of guilt, and imposition of sentence are specifically reserved for the district judge.
Source: Leagle
