Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. RIMPSON, 1:06-CR-128. (2015)

Court: District Court, W.D. Michigan Number: infdco20150624c07 Visitors: 8
Filed: Jun. 23, 2015
Latest Update: Jun. 23, 2015
Summary: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ROBERT HOLMES BELL , District Judge . Defendant Anthony Cornell Rimpson has filed a motion for modification or reduction of sentence (ECF No. 135) pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) on the basis of Amendment 782 of the United States Sentencing Guidelines, made retroactive by the Sentencing Commission. Section 3582(c)(2) permits a court to reduce the term of imprisonment of a defendant who has been sentenced based on a sentencing range that has subsequently been
More

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Defendant Anthony Cornell Rimpson has filed a motion for modification or reduction of sentence (ECF No. 135) pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3582(c)(2) on the basis of Amendment 782 of the United States Sentencing Guidelines, made retroactive by the Sentencing Commission.

Section 3582(c)(2) permits a court to reduce the term of imprisonment of a defendant who has been sentenced based on a sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered by the Sentencing Commission. 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). Amendment 782 of the United States Sentencing Guidelines reduced by two levels the offense levels assigned to the quantities that trigger the statutory mandatory minimum penalties in U.S.S.G. §§ 2D1.1 and 2D1.11. These modifications were made retroactive effective November 1, 2014. U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10.

The probation department has prepared a sentence modification report recommending no reduction in the original sentence (ECF No. 149). The report indicates that based on Amendment 782 the Court should not reduce a defendant's sentence because the new calculation does not result in a lower guideline range as result of the 2014 drug amendment. Defense counsel has filed a response to the sentence modification report (ECF No. 151) and wishes to preserve the issue for future consideration should the law change.

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's motion for modification of sentence (ECF No. 135) pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) is DENIED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer