Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. ALBAREZ, 1:13-CR-148. (2015)

Court: District Court, W.D. Michigan Number: infdco20151117a81 Visitors: 12
Filed: Nov. 16, 2015
Latest Update: Nov. 16, 2015
Summary: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ROBERT HOLMES BELL , District Judge . Defendant Gilbert Albarez has filed a motion for modification or reduction of sentence (ECF No. 68) pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) on the basis of Amendment 782 of the United States Sentencing Guidelines, made retroactive by the Sentencing Commission. Section 3582(c)(2) permits a court to reduce the term of imprisonment of a defendant who has been sentenced based on a sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered
More

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Defendant Gilbert Albarez has filed a motion for modification or reduction of sentence (ECF No. 68) pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3582(c)(2) on the basis of Amendment 782 of the United States Sentencing Guidelines, made retroactive by the Sentencing Commission.

Section 3582(c)(2) permits a court to reduce the term of imprisonment of a defendant who has been sentenced based on a sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered by the Sentencing Commission. 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). Amendment 782 of the United States Sentencing Guidelines reduced by two levels the offense levels assigned to the quantities that trigger the statutory mandatory minimum penalties in U.S.S.G. §§ 2D1.1 and 2D1.11. These modifications were made retroactive effective November 1, 2014. U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10.

The Probation Department filed a sentence modification report on 10/26/15 (ECF No. 85). In its report, the probation department recommended the defendant is eligible for reduction in sentence based on defendant currently being an inmate, USSG § 2D1.1 was used in the guideline calculations, and the guideline range applicable to the defendant subsequently has been lowered as a result of the retroactive amendment to the Sentencing Guidelines (782). A reduction of sentence is consistent with the policy statements of the U.S. Sentencing Commission. Counsel for the defendant filed a response to the sentence modification report (ECF No 87) concurring with the probation department's recommendation. The government also filed a response (ECF No. 88) concurring with the recommendation.

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's motion for modification of sentence (ECF No. 68) pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) is GRANTED. Defendant Gilbert Albarez's sentence shall be reduced to 68 months imprisonment. An order effectuating the sentence reduction shall issue forthwith.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer