Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. VILLANUEVA-RODRIGUEZ, 1:15-cr-00192. (2015)

Court: District Court, W.D. Michigan Number: infdco20160105885 Visitors: 10
Filed: Dec. 09, 2015
Latest Update: Dec. 09, 2015
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ELLEN S. CARMODY , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to W.D. MICH. L.CR.R. 11.1, I conducted a plea hearing in the captioned case on December 9, 2015, after receiving the written consent of defendant and all counsel. There is no written plea agreement. At the hearing, defendant Jose Luis Villanueva-Rodriguez entered a plea of guilty to Count One of the Indictment charging defendant with making a false statement with regard to citizenship in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1015
More

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Pursuant to W.D. MICH. L.CR.R. 11.1, I conducted a plea hearing in the captioned case on December 9, 2015, after receiving the written consent of defendant and all counsel. There is no written plea agreement. At the hearing, defendant Jose Luis Villanueva-Rodriguez entered a plea of guilty to Count One of the Indictment charging defendant with making a false statement with regard to citizenship in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1015(e). On the basis of the record made at the hearing, I find that defendant is fully capable and competent to enter an informed plea; that the plea is made knowingly and with full understanding of each of the rights waived by defendant; that it is made voluntarily and free from any force, threats, or promises; that the defendant understands the nature of the charge and penalties provided by law; and that the plea has a sufficient basis in fact.

I therefore recommend that defendant's plea of guilty to Count One of the Indictment be accepted, and that the court adjudicate defendant guilty. Acceptance of the plea, adjudication of guilt, and imposition of sentence are specifically reserved for the district judge.

NOTICE TO PARTIES

You have the right to de novo review of the foregoing findings by the district judge. Any application for review must be in writing, must specify the portions of the findings or proceedings objected to, and must be filed and served no later than 14 days after the plea hearing. See W.D. MICH. L.CR.R. 11.1(d).

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer