Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Goines v. Burton, 1:15-cv-354. (2017)

Court: District Court, W.D. Michigan Number: infdco20171006r15 Visitors: 10
Filed: Sep. 29, 2017
Latest Update: Sep. 29, 2017
Summary: ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION PAUL L. MALONEY , District Judge . This is a habeas corpus petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. The matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Phillip J. Green, who issued a Report and Recommendation on September 5, 2017, recommending that this Court deny the petition. The Report and Recommendation was duly served on the parties. No objections have been filed, see 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1), and the Court issues this Order. The Court
More

ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This is a habeas corpus petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Phillip J. Green, who issued a Report and Recommendation on September 5, 2017, recommending that this Court deny the petition. The Report and Recommendation was duly served on the parties. No objections have been filed, see 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and the Court issues this Order. The Court will also issue a Judgment in this § 2254 proceeding. See Gillis v. United States, 729 F.3d 641, 643 (6th Cir. 2013) (requiring a separate judgment in habeas proceedings). Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 10) is APPROVED and ADOPTED as the Opinion of the Court and the petition for habeas corpus relief (ECF No. 1) is DENIED for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) is DENIED as to each issue asserted. See RULES GOVERNING § 2254 CASES, Rule 11 (requiring the district court to "issue or deny a certificate of appealability when it enters a final order"). Petitioner has not demonstrated that reasonable jurists would find the Court's rulings debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473 (2000); Murphy v. Ohio, 263 F.3d 466, 466-67 (6th Cir. 2001).

JUDGMENT

In accordance with the Order entered on this date:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Respondent.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer