Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Reed v. Commissioner of Social Security, 1:16-cv-572. (2018)

Court: District Court, W.D. Michigan Number: infdco20181127a50 Visitors: 12
Filed: Nov. 26, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 26, 2018
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION PAUL L. MALONEY , District Judge . Plaintiff seeks an award of attorney fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 406(b). The matter was referred to the Magistrate Judge, who issued a Report and Recommendation on October 30, 2018. The Report and Recommendation was duly served on the parties. No objections have been filed. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1). Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 24) is APPR
More

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff seeks an award of attorney fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). The matter was referred to the Magistrate Judge, who issued a Report and Recommendation on October 30, 2018. The Report and Recommendation was duly served on the parties. No objections have been filed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 24) is APPROVED and ADOPTED as the Opinion of the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion (ECF No. 21) is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff' counsel shall REFUND to Plaintiff the previously awarded EAJA fee in the amount of $3,237.50.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer