Cooley v. FedEx Freight Inc., 1:18-cv-372. (2018)
Court: District Court, W.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20181220c34
Visitors: 12
Filed: Nov. 29, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 29, 2018
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ELLEN S. CARMODY , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion to Remand. (ECF No. 13). Plaintiff initiated this action in state court after which Defendant FedEx Freight removed the matter to this Court. Plaintiff now moves to remand this matter to state court. Plaintiff has failed, however, to identify any authority requiring or authorizing this matter to be remanded to state court. Accordingly, the undersigned recommends that Plai
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ELLEN S. CARMODY , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion to Remand. (ECF No. 13). Plaintiff initiated this action in state court after which Defendant FedEx Freight removed the matter to this Court. Plaintiff now moves to remand this matter to state court. Plaintiff has failed, however, to identify any authority requiring or authorizing this matter to be remanded to state court. Accordingly, the undersigned recommends that Plain..
More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
ELLEN S. CARMODY, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion to Remand. (ECF No. 13). Plaintiff initiated this action in state court after which Defendant FedEx Freight removed the matter to this Court. Plaintiff now moves to remand this matter to state court. Plaintiff has failed, however, to identify any authority requiring or authorizing this matter to be remanded to state court. Accordingly, the undersigned recommends that Plaintiff's motion be denied.
OBJECTIONS to this Report and Recommendation must be filed with the Clerk of Court within fourteen (14) days of the date of service of this notice. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). Failure to file objections within the specified time waives the right to appeal the District Court's order. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir.1981).
Source: Leagle
