Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Smith v. Wriggelsworth, 1:18-cv-571. (2019)

Court: District Court, W.D. Michigan Number: infdco20190123c09 Visitors: 14
Filed: Jan. 22, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 22, 2019
Summary: ORDER JANET T. NEFF , District Judge . This is a prisoner civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. The matter was referred to the Magistrate Judge, who issued a Report and Recommendation on December 20, 2018, recommending that this Court grant the motion and that this action be terminated. The Report and Recommendation was duly served on the parties. No objections have been filed. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1). Therefore, IT IS
More

ORDER

This is a prisoner civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. The matter was referred to the Magistrate Judge, who issued a Report and Recommendation on December 20, 2018, recommending that this Court grant the motion and that this action be terminated. The Report and Recommendation was duly served on the parties. No objections have been filed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 19) is APPROVED and ADOPTED as the Opinion of the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 16) is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal of this decision would not be taken in good faith. See McGore v. Wrigglesworth, 114 F.3d 601, 610-11 (6th Cir. 1997), overruled on other grounds by Jones v. Bock, 549 U.S. 199, 206, 211-12 (2007).

A Judgment will be entered consistent with this Order.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer