U.S. v. Neal, 1:19-cr-00014. (2019)
Court: District Court, W.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20190201a56
Visitors: 7
Filed: Jan. 31, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 31, 2019
Summary: ORDER PHILLIP J. GREEN , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the Court on the government's motion for pretrial detention. The government sought defendant Jerry Neal's detention on the basis of that he poses a danger to the community, 18 U.S.C. 1342(f)(1), and that he poses a significant risk of flight, 18 U.S.C. 3142(f)(2)(A). The Court conducted an evidentiary hearing on January 29, 2019, at which defendant was represented by counsel. Having considered the evidence presented at
Summary: ORDER PHILLIP J. GREEN , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the Court on the government's motion for pretrial detention. The government sought defendant Jerry Neal's detention on the basis of that he poses a danger to the community, 18 U.S.C. 1342(f)(1), and that he poses a significant risk of flight, 18 U.S.C. 3142(f)(2)(A). The Court conducted an evidentiary hearing on January 29, 2019, at which defendant was represented by counsel. Having considered the evidence presented at t..
More
ORDER
PHILLIP J. GREEN, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the government's motion for pretrial detention. The government sought defendant Jerry Neal's detention on the basis of that he poses a danger to the community, 18 U.S.C. § 1342(f)(1), and that he poses a significant risk of flight, 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f)(2)(A). The Court conducted an evidentiary hearing on January 29, 2019, at which defendant was represented by counsel.
Having considered the evidence presented at the hearing, the parties' oral submissions, and the information in the Pretrial Services Report, and for the reasons stated on the record, the Court finds that the government has not met its burden of establishing by preponderant evidence that defendant poses a significant risk of flight. However, the government has met its burden of proving by clear and convincing evidence that defendant poses a danger to the community. The Court finds, as explained on the record, that there is no condition or combination of conditions that will assure the safety of the community.
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that defendant is committed to the custody of the Attorney General pending trial.
DONE AND ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
