Filed: Mar. 05, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 05, 2019
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION PAUL L. MALONEY , District Judge . This is a prisoner civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment. The matter was referred to the Magistrate Judge, who issued a Report and Recommendation on January 11, 2019, recommending that this Court grant the motion and enter judgment in favor of Defendant. The Report and Recommendation was duly served on the parties. Plaintiff's request for an extension
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION PAUL L. MALONEY , District Judge . This is a prisoner civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment. The matter was referred to the Magistrate Judge, who issued a Report and Recommendation on January 11, 2019, recommending that this Court grant the motion and enter judgment in favor of Defendant. The Report and Recommendation was duly served on the parties. Plaintiff's request for an extension o..
More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
PAUL L. MALONEY, District Judge.
This is a prisoner civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment. The matter was referred to the Magistrate Judge, who issued a Report and Recommendation on January 11, 2019, recommending that this Court grant the motion and enter judgment in favor of Defendant. The Report and Recommendation was duly served on the parties. Plaintiff's request for an extension of time to file objections was granted, however, no objections have been filed to date. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Therefore,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 18) is APPROVED and ADOPTED as the Opinion of the Court.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 13) is GRANTED. Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal of this decision would not be taken in good faith. See McGore v. Wrigglesworth, 114 F.3d 601, 610-11 (6th Cir. 1997), overruled on other grounds by Jones v. Bock, 549 U.S. 199, 206, 211-12 (2007).
A Judgment will be entered consistent with this Order.
