Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security, 1:16-cv-368. (2019)
Court: District Court, W.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20190628c17
Visitors: 4
Filed: Jun. 27, 2019
Latest Update: Jun. 27, 2019
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION PAUL L. MALONEY , District Judge . Plaintiff filed this case seeking judicial review of a decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration. 42 U.S.C. 405(g). Defendant filed an unopposed motion to reopen the case to enter dismissal. The matter was referred to the Magistrate Judge, who issued a Report and Recommendation on June 12, 2019, recommending that this case be reopened and dismissed. The Report and Recommendation was duly
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION PAUL L. MALONEY , District Judge . Plaintiff filed this case seeking judicial review of a decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration. 42 U.S.C. 405(g). Defendant filed an unopposed motion to reopen the case to enter dismissal. The matter was referred to the Magistrate Judge, who issued a Report and Recommendation on June 12, 2019, recommending that this case be reopened and dismissed. The Report and Recommendation was duly s..
More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
PAUL L. MALONEY, District Judge.
Plaintiff filed this case seeking judicial review of a decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration. 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Defendant filed an unopposed motion to reopen the case to enter dismissal. The matter was referred to the Magistrate Judge, who issued a Report and Recommendation on June 12, 2019, recommending that this case be reopened and dismissed. The Report and Recommendation was duly served on the parties. No objections have been filed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Therefore,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 13) is APPROVED and ADOPTED as the Opinion of the Court.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's motion to reopen the case (ECF No. 12) is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is is DISMISSED with prejudice.
A Judgment will be entered consistent with this Order.
Source: Leagle