Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Budd v. Landings at the Preserve, 1:19-cv-465. (2019)

Court: District Court, W.D. Michigan Number: infdco20191224a64 Visitors: 9
Filed: Dec. 23, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 23, 2019
Summary: ORDER JANET T. NEFF , District Judge . This is a civil action filed by a pro se litigant. Defendant The Landings at the Preserve filed a Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 10). The matter was referred to the Magistrate Judge, who issued a Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 13) on December 2, 2019, recommending that the motion be granted, Does 1-100 be dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2), and the complaint be dismissed with prejudice. The Report and Recommendation was duly served. No obj
More

ORDER

This is a civil action filed by a pro se litigant. Defendant The Landings at the Preserve filed a Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 10). The matter was referred to the Magistrate Judge, who issued a Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 13) on December 2, 2019, recommending that the motion be granted, Does 1-100 be dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2), and the complaint be dismissed with prejudice. The Report and Recommendation was duly served. No objections have been filed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF. No. 13) is APPROVED and ADOPTED as the Opinion of the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 10) is GRANTED, Does 1-100 are DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2), and the Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice for the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation.

A Judgment will be entered consistent with this Order.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer