Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Scalia v. E.L.A. Food Services LLC, 1:20-cv-15. (2020)

Court: District Court, W.D. Michigan Number: infdco20200122e41 Visitors: 6
Filed: Jan. 21, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 21, 2020
Summary: CONSENT JUDGMENT PAUL L. MALONEY , District Judge . Plaintiff, EUGENE SCALIA, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor ("Secretary"), having filed his Complaint and Defendants E.L.A. FOOD SERVICES LLC and PAUL VLAHAKIS, an individual (collectively, "Defendants"), having appeared by counsel, having received a copy of the Complaint, waived service, and having been duly advised in the premises, agree to the entry of this Consent Judgment without contest. Now, therefore, upo
More

CONSENT JUDGMENT

Plaintiff, EUGENE SCALIA, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor ("Secretary"), having filed his Complaint and Defendants E.L.A. FOOD SERVICES LLC and PAUL VLAHAKIS, an individual (collectively, "Defendants"), having appeared by counsel, having received a copy of the Complaint, waived service, and having been duly advised in the premises, agree to the entry of this Consent Judgment without contest. Now, therefore, upon motion for the attorneys for the Secretary and Defendants, and for cause shown:

JUDGMENT IS HEREBY ENTERED against Defendants pursuant to sections 16(c) and 17 of the Act as follows.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, pursuant to section 17 of the Act, that the Defendants, their officers, agents, servants, successors, employees, and all persons in active concert or participation with them be and hereby are, pennanently enjoined and restrained from violating the provisions of the Act, in any of the following manners.

I

A. Defendants shall not, contrary to sections 7 and 15(a)(2) of the Act, employ any nonexempt employees who in any workweek are engaged in commerce or the production of goods for commerce, or who are employed in an enterprise engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce, within the meaning of the Act, for workweeks longer than 40 hours, unless such employee receives compensation for his employment in excess of 40 hours at a rate not less than one and one-half times the regular rates at which he is employed, subject to Section 13 of the Act.

B. Defendants shall not, contrary to sections 6 and 15(a)(2) of the Act, pay any of their nonexempt employees who in any workweek are engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce or who are employed in an enterprise engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce, within the meaning of the Act, wages at a rate less than $7.25 per hour (or at a rate less than such other applicable minimum rate as may hereinafter be established by amendment to the Act).

C. Defendants shall not fail to make, keep and preserve records of their nonexempt employees and of the wages, hours, and other conditions and practices of employment maintained by them as prescribed by the regulations issued, and from time to time amended, pursuant to section 11(c) of the Act and found in 29 CFR Part 516. This includes, but is not limited to, maintaining records of all hours worked by each nonexempt employee in each workday and each workweek, and records of compensation paid to each such employee in each workweek, whether payment is made by a payroll check, personal check, cash or a combination thereof. The records maintained by Defendants shall also include, but not be limited to, the full name and last-known mailing address of all employees, the daily work start and stop times of each employee, and the specific method of payment made to each employee.

D. Defendants, their agents, officers or employees shall not, contrary to section 15(a)(3) of the Act, threaten, retaliate, or discriminate in any way against any cuirent or former employee of Defendants for exercising any rights under the FLSA, including, but not limited to, employee complaints regarding FLSA compliance made to Defendants or to the Wage and Hour Division of the United States Department of Labor, or cooperation with an investigation conducted by the Wage and Hour Division.

II

FURTHER, pursuant to section 17 of the Act, Defendants shall not withhold payment of the sum of $148,567.24 which represents the unpaid minimum wage and overtime compensation hereby found to be due for the periods from January 1, 2015 to January 1, 2017 to the present and former employees named in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof, in the amounts set forth therein.

III

The monetary provisions of this Consent Judgment shall be deemed satisfied upon Defendants' delivery to the Plaintiff's representative of the following:

(1) Defendants have paid the amounts identified in paragraphs II herein to the Plaintiff in one payment of $148,567.24 on December 29, 2019. The payment of $148,567.24 has been delivered to Plaintiff's counsel by Defendants submitting certified checks or cashier's checks payable to "United States Department of Labor — Wage and Hour Division." Defendants shall also deliver to Plaintiff's counsel, within seven (7) days after this Consent Judgment is filed with the Court, a schedule listing the name, last-known address, and social security number of each employee listed on Exhibit A. Defendants remain responsible for their employer share of applicable taxes.

(2) The Plaintiff shall distribute the proceeds of the payment (less legal deductions for each employee's share of social security and Federal withholding taxes for back wages) to the persons identified in Exhibit A, or to their estates, if that be necessary; and any amounts referenced above of unpaid compensation and liquidated damages not so paid within a period of three (3) years from the date of receipt thereof shall, pursuant to section 16(c) of the Act, be covered into the Treasury of the United States as miscellaneous receipts.

IV

Defendants shall not request, solicit, suggest, or coerce, directly, or indirectly, any current or former employee to return or to offer to return to the Defendants or to someone else for the Defendants, any money in the form of cash, check, or any other form, for wages previously due or to become due in the future to said employee under the provisions of this Consent Judgment or the Act; nor shall Defendants accept, or receive from any employee, either directly or indirectly, any money in the form of cash, check, or any other form, for wages heretofore or hereafter paid to said employee under the provisions of this Consent Judgment or the Act; nor shall Defendants discharge or in any other manner discriminate, nor solicit or encourage anyone else to discriminate, against any such employee because such employee has received or retained money due to him from the Defendants under the provisions of this Consent Judgment or the Act.

V

FURTHER, it is agreed by the parties herein and hereby ORDERED that each party bears its own fees and other expenses incurred by such party in connection with any stage of this proceeding to date with no costs, including, but not limited to, any and all costs referenced under the Equal Access to Justice Act, as Amended.

VI

FURTHER, this Court shall retain jurisdiction of this matter to enforce the terms of this judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54.

SO ORDERED.

EXHIBIT A

Last Name First Name Espino Monico $99.69 Fajardo Hector $71.79 Garcia Ruben $6,964.88 Green Berg Zachary $920.00 Hitchcock Robert $195.27 McQueen James $455.23 Nickels Christopher $20.16 Perez Miguel $33.77 Reices Kylie $8,784.79 Adarne Jazmine $3,087.19 Anderson Adam $1,911.01 Appledoorn Anna $2,634.28 Beachbau Isabella $1,096.89 Beadling Drew $454.36 Belanger Brooke $4,515.01 Biere LaRon $34.35 Binke Olivia $647.71 Bravo-Ramirez Julian $56.33 Breck Mckahla $663.53 Brooks Morgan $1,007.62 Bunish Brett $2,144.78 Burney Whitney $404.38 Campbell Consuela $2,979.65 Candela Breanna $1,430.21 Carter Elizabeth $1,732.22 Cataldo Angela $2,003.73 Chandler Whitney $772.47 Culing Campbell $1,231.97 Cummings Brennen $37.37 Cummings Spencer $2,961.10 Denoyer Sudney $1,953.37 Duke Kandice $3,889.18 Dulmage Mariah $1,544.58 Eisbrenner Louis $45.49 Eldredge Calli $163.04 Engle Ian $27.32 Flemming Hannah $33.57 Frantz Jarneie $1,797.28 Geerligs Nickolas $808.58 Goss Ruby $929.24 Green Maria $1,463.14 Griffin Caroline $823.46 Gubert Tammy $8,098.29 Higgins Kyrie $3,346.00 Jerzak Michael $2,643.91 Johnston-Roper Kelton $1,125.85 Kaufman Eric $630.16 Kimberly Kevin $1,392.02 Klaus Courtney $5,817.72 Korrey Alexis $100.03 Leitner Rachel $4,851.98 May Austin $894.89 McArdle Heather $626.17 McKinney Etaly $444.40 Merry Breann $3,996.72 Miksicek Eli $2,385.72 O'Hare Lance $2,037.05 Padilla Maddie $229.18 Pavlinac Rhiannon $2,181.90 Peters Amber $524.58 Pirrie Deanna $34.04 Platte Brian $172.83 Pullano Max $131.58 Rakipi Rina $2,293.70 Rogers Kyle $6,051.31 Romain Noah $1,412.52 Rudert John $1,463.64 Sahouri Zach $6,602.10 Schultz Alyssa $3,643.00 Shanker Julia $702.79 Smith Rachel $6,233.08 Stevens Joseph $1,227.36 Swider Katryna $1,462.82 Tabaczka Brittany $807.95 Thompson Demeterios $2,935.21 Tyler Max $1,752.62 Urban Andrea $1,962.11 Vasquez Randy $760.84 Vaughn Luke $229.70 Wilder Heather $701.66 Williams Juwan $40.85 Wilman Michael $79.70 Willoughby Stephanie $2,001.03 Wojtunik Adam $377.22 Wright Meredith $1,331.02
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer