RUDDOCK v. DOOLEY, Civil 10-0246 (JRT/FLN). (2010)
Court: District Court, D. Minnesota
Number: infdco20101224235
Visitors: 12
Filed: Dec. 23, 2010
Latest Update: Dec. 23, 2010
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION JOHN R. TUNHEIM, District Judge. The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Franklin L. Noel dated October 28, 2010 [Docket No. 36]. No objections have been filed to that Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted. Based upon the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and all of the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1) Petitioner'
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION JOHN R. TUNHEIM, District Judge. The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Franklin L. Noel dated October 28, 2010 [Docket No. 36]. No objections have been filed to that Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted. Based upon the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and all of the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1) Petitioner's..
More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
JOHN R. TUNHEIM, District Judge.
The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Franklin L. Noel dated October 28, 2010 [Docket No. 36]. No objections have been filed to that Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted.
Based upon the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and all of the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1) Petitioner's Amended Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody [Docket No. 10] be DENIED; 2) This action be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and 3) JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
It is further recommended, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c), that a Certificate of Appealability not be issued because Petitioner has failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of any constitutional right.
Source: Leagle
