PEPE v. ASTRUE, 10-336 (DWF/SER). (2011)
Court: District Court, D. Minnesota
Number: infdco20110121a34
Visitors: 17
Filed: Jan. 19, 2011
Latest Update: Jan. 19, 2011
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION DONOVAN W. FRANK, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Franklin L. Noel dated December 23, 2010. No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed within the requisite time period. Based on the foregoing, and all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. [13]) is GRANTED ; 2. Defendant's moti
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION DONOVAN W. FRANK, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Franklin L. Noel dated December 23, 2010. No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed within the requisite time period. Based on the foregoing, and all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. [13]) is GRANTED ; 2. Defendant's motio..
More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
DONOVAN W. FRANK, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Franklin L. Noel dated December 23, 2010. No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed within the requisite time period.
Based on the foregoing, and all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. [13]) is GRANTED;
2. Defendant's motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. [24]) is DENIED; and
3. This action is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Source: Leagle
