Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

PETERSON v. SEAGATE US LLC, 07-2502. (2011)

Court: District Court, D. Minnesota Number: infdco20110331c43 Visitors: 6
Filed: Mar. 30, 2011
Latest Update: Mar. 30, 2011
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL J. DAVIS, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs' Objections to Chief Magistrate Judge Arthur J. Boylan's Order dated February 2, 2011 [Doc. No. 360] denying their motion to compel discovery. Plaintiffs object to that portion of the Order that denied their request for the production of performance evaluation documents. The Court must modify or set aside any portion of the Magistrate Judge's Order found to be clearly erroneous or contrary to law. See 28 U
More

ORDER

MICHAEL J. DAVIS, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs' Objections to Chief Magistrate Judge Arthur J. Boylan's Order dated February 2, 2011 [Doc. No. 360] denying their motion to compel discovery.

Plaintiffs object to that portion of the Order that denied their request for the production of performance evaluation documents. The Court must modify or set aside any portion of the Magistrate Judge's Order found to be clearly erroneous or contrary to law. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a); Local Rule 72.2(a). Based on a review of the record and the submissions of the parties, the Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's Order is neither clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

Accordingly, the Order of Chief Magistrate Judge Arthur J. Boylan dated February 2, 2011 [Doc. No. 360] is AFFIRMED in all respects.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer