Filed: Apr. 05, 2011
Latest Update: Apr. 05, 2011
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION DONOVAN W. FRANK, District Judge. This matter is before the Court upon Defendant Jose Arcadio Guillen Tapia's objections to Magistrate Judge Jeanne J. Graham's March 2, 2011 Report and Recommendation insofar as it recommends that Defendant's motion to suppress evidence from search and seizure be denied. The Court has conducted a de novo review of the record, including a review of the arguments and submissions of counsel, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION DONOVAN W. FRANK, District Judge. This matter is before the Court upon Defendant Jose Arcadio Guillen Tapia's objections to Magistrate Judge Jeanne J. Graham's March 2, 2011 Report and Recommendation insofar as it recommends that Defendant's motion to suppress evidence from search and seizure be denied. The Court has conducted a de novo review of the record, including a review of the arguments and submissions of counsel, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)..
More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
DONOVAN W. FRANK, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court upon Defendant Jose Arcadio Guillen Tapia's objections to Magistrate Judge Jeanne J. Graham's March 2, 2011 Report and Recommendation insofar as it recommends that Defendant's motion to suppress evidence from search and seizure be denied.
The Court has conducted a de novo review of the record, including a review of the arguments and submissions of counsel, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rule 72.2(b). The factual background for the above-entitled matter is clearly and precisely set forth in the Report and Recommendation and is incorporated by reference for purposes of Defendant's objections.
Based upon the de novo review of the record and all of the arguments and submissions of the parties and the Court being otherwise duly advised in the premises, the Court hereby enters the following:
ORDER
1. Defendant Jose Arcadio Guillen Tapia's objections (Doc. No. [31]) to Magistrate Judge Jeanne J. Graham's March 2, 2011 Report and Recommendation are DENIED.
2. Magistrate Judge Jeanne J. Graham's March 2, 2011 Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. [30]), is ADOPTED.
3. Defendant Jose Arcadio Guillen Tapia's motion to suppress evidence from search and seizure (Doc. No. [10]) is DENIED.
