Filed: Jun. 20, 2011
Latest Update: Jun. 20, 2011
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL J. DAVIS, Chief District Judge. The above-entitled matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Jeffrey J. Keyes dated May 9, 2011. [Docket Nos. 357, 358, 359, 360, 361, 362, 363] Defendants Okafor, Dwamina, and Roberts filed objections to the Report and Recommendation. Defendants Osei-Tutu, Farah, Adejumo, and Adeniran filed no objections to the Report and Recommendation. Pursuant to statute, the Court has conducted a de no
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL J. DAVIS, Chief District Judge. The above-entitled matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Jeffrey J. Keyes dated May 9, 2011. [Docket Nos. 357, 358, 359, 360, 361, 362, 363] Defendants Okafor, Dwamina, and Roberts filed objections to the Report and Recommendation. Defendants Osei-Tutu, Farah, Adejumo, and Adeniran filed no objections to the Report and Recommendation. Pursuant to statute, the Court has conducted a de nov..
More
ORDER
MICHAEL J. DAVIS, Chief District Judge.
The above-entitled matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Jeffrey J. Keyes dated May 9, 2011. [Docket Nos. 357, 358, 359, 360, 361, 362, 363]
Defendants Okafor, Dwamina, and Roberts filed objections to the Report and Recommendation. Defendants Osei-Tutu, Farah, Adejumo, and Adeniran filed no objections to the Report and Recommendation.
Pursuant to statute, the Court has conducted a de novo review of the record. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Local Rule 72.2(b). Based upon that review, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Keyes dated May 9, 2011.
Accordingly, based upon the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
1. The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Jeffrey J. Keyes dated May 9, 2011. [Docket Nos. 357, 358, 359, 360, 361, 362, 363].
2. Defendant Roberts's Motion for Severance Pursuant to Rules 8(b) and 14 [Docket No. 155] is DENIED.
3. Defendant Osei-Tutu's Motion for Severance *Docket No. 163+ is DENIED.
4. Defendant Okafor's Motion for Severance *Docket No. 178+ is DENIED.
5. Defendant Farah's Motion to Sever Defendants *Docket No. 196+ is DENIED.
6. Defendant Dwamina's Motion for Severance of Defendants *Docket No. 210] is DENIED.
7. Defendant Adeniran's Pretrial Motion for Severance *Docket No. 218] is DENIED.
8. Defendant Adejumo's Motion for Severance *Docket No. 328+ is DENIED.
