Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

GRADY v. ZANDERS, 10-CV-0768 (PJS/JJK). (2011)

Court: District Court, D. Minnesota Number: infdco20110712683 Visitors: 13
Filed: Jul. 08, 2011
Latest Update: Jul. 08, 2011
Summary: ORDER PATRICK J. SCHILTZ, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the objection of William John Grady, III, to the April 7, 2011 Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of Magistrate Judge Jeffrey J. Keyes. The Court has reviewed de novo those portions of the R&R to which Grady has objected, as required by 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). The Court overrules Grady's objection and adopts Judge Keyes's R&R. ORDER Based on the foregoing, and on all of the files, records, an
More

ORDER

PATRICK J. SCHILTZ, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the objection of William John Grady, III, to the April 7, 2011 Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of Magistrate Judge Jeffrey J. Keyes. The Court has reviewed de novo those portions of the R&R to which Grady has objected, as required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). The Court overrules Grady's objection and adopts Judge Keyes's R&R.

ORDER

Based on the foregoing, and on all of the files, records, and proceedings herein, the Court OVERRULES Grady's objection [Docket No. 23] and ADOPTS Judge Keyes's R&R [Docket No. 22]. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. The petition of William John Grady, III, under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED. 2. This case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 3. No certificate of appealability will issue.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer