U.S. v. OKEAYAINNEH, 11-87 (MJD/JJK). (2011)
Court: District Court, D. Minnesota
Number: infdco20111216756
Visitors: 14
Filed: Dec. 15, 2011
Latest Update: Dec. 15, 2011
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL J. DAVIS, Chief District Judge. The above-entitled matter comes before the Court upon the Order and Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Franklin L. Noel filed October 11, 2011. Defendant appealed the Order and filed objections to the Report and Recommendation. Pursuant to statute, the Court has conducted a de novo review upon the record. 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1); Local Rule 72.2(b). Based upon that review, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL J. DAVIS, Chief District Judge. The above-entitled matter comes before the Court upon the Order and Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Franklin L. Noel filed October 11, 2011. Defendant appealed the Order and filed objections to the Report and Recommendation. Pursuant to statute, the Court has conducted a de novo review upon the record. 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1); Local Rule 72.2(b). Based upon that review, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of U..
More
ORDER
MICHAEL J. DAVIS, Chief District Judge.
The above-entitled matter comes before the Court upon the Order and Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Franklin L. Noel filed October 11, 2011. Defendant appealed the Order and filed objections to the Report and Recommendation.
Pursuant to statute, the Court has conducted a de novo review upon the record. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Local Rule 72.2(b). Based upon that review, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Franklin L. Noel filed October 11, 2011.
This Court will reverse a magistrate judge's order on a nondispositive issue if it is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A); D. Minn. L.R. 72.2(a). The Court has reviewed the submissions and the record in this case and concludes that Magistrate Judge Noel's October 11, 2011 Order is neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law. Therefore, the October 11 Order is affirmed.
Accordingly, based upon the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
1. The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Franklin L. Noel filed October 11, 2011 [Docket No. 481].
2. To the extent Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration and Dismissal Based on Prosecutorial Misconduct [Docket No. 445] seeks to dismiss the complaint and indictment, it is DENIED.
3. The Court AFFIRMS the Order of United States Magistrate Judge Franklin L. Noel filed October 11, 2011 [Docket No. 480].
Source: Leagle
